Advancement
Please note: this entry is from 1911.
Also, nothing on this page is intended as legal
advice.

ADVANCEMENT, a term technically used in English law for a sum
of money or other benefit, given by a father during his lifetime to his
child, which must be brought into account by the child on a distribution
of the father’s estate upon an intestacy on pain of his being excluded
from participating in such distribution. The principle is of ancient
origin; as regards goods and chattels it was part of the ancient customs
of London and the province of York, and as regards land descending in
coparcenary it has always been part of the common law of England under
the name of hotch-pot (q.v.). The general rule was established by the
Statutes of Distribution. The conditions under which cases of
advancement arise are as follows: There must be a complete intestacy;
the intestate estate must be that of the father; and the advancement
must have been made in the lifetime of the father. Land which belongs
or would belong to a child as heir at law or customary heir need not be
brought in to the common fund, even though such land was given during
the father’s life. The widow can gain no advantage from any
advancement. No child can be forced to account for his or her
advancement, but in default thereof he will be excluded from a share in
the intestate’s estate. As to what is an advancement there has been
much conflict of judicial opinion. According to one view, nothing is an
advancement unless it be given “on marriage or to establish the child in
life.” The other and probably the correct view is that any considerable
sum of money paid to a child at that child’s request is an advancement;
thus payment of a son’s debts of honour has been held to be an
advancement. On the other hand, trivial gifts and presents to a child
are undoubtedly not advancements.
|
Home
Index
About Us
Legal

 |